处理多样性关系
舒适的家庭生活会导致一个或更多 “小人儿” 降临到这个家庭。但是，在增加小孩到家庭中之前，先确保 Person 真正有地方可住。给他们一个工作场所，或者还有一个很好的夏日度假屋。一个 Address 类型应该可以解决所有这三个地方。
清单 1. 添加一个 Address 类型到 Person 类中
package com.tedneward.model;
public class Address
{
public Address()
{
}
public Address(String street, String city, String state, String zip)
{
this.street = street; this.city = city;
this.state = state; this.zip = zip;
}
public String toString()
{
return "[Address: " +
"street=" + street + " " +
"city=" + city + " " +
"state=" + state + " " +
"zip=" + zip + "]";
}
public int hashCode()
{
return street.hashCode() & city.hashCode() &
state.hashCode() & zip.hashCode();
}
public boolean equals(Object obj)
{
if (obj == this)
return this;
if (obj instanceof Address)
{
Address rhs = (Address)obj;
return (this.street.equals(rhs.street) &&
this.city.equals(rhs.city) &&
this.state.equals(rhs.state) &&
this.zip.equals(rhs.zip));
}
else
return false;
}
public String getStreet() { return this.street; }
public void setStreet(String value) { this.street = value; }
public String getCity() { return this.city; }
public void setCity(String value) { this.city = value; }
public String getState() { return this.state; }
public void setState(String value) { this.state = value; }
public String getZip() { return this.zip; }
public void setZip(String value) { this.zip = value; }
private String street;
private String city;
private String state;
private String zip;
}
可以看到，Address 只是一个简单的数据对象。将它添加到 Person 类中意味着 Person 将有一个名为 addresses 的 Address 数组作为字段。第一个地址是家庭住址，第二个是工作地址，第三个（如果不为 null 的话）是度假屋地址。当然，这些都被设置为 protected，以便将来通过方法来封装。
完成这些设置后，现在可以增强 Person 类，使之支持小孩，所以为 Person 定义一个新字段：一个 Person ArrayList，它同样也有一些相关的方法，以便进行适当的封装。
接下来，由于大多数小孩都有父母，还将添加两个字段来表示母亲和父亲，并增加适当的 accessor/mutator 方法。将为 Person 类增加一个新的方法，使之可以创建一个新的 Person，这个方法有一个贴切的名称，即 haveBaby。此外还增加一些业务规则，以支持生小孩的生物学需求，并将这个新的小 Person 添加到为母亲和父亲字段创建的 children ArrayList 中。做完这些之后，再将这个婴儿返回给调用者。
清单 2 显示，新定义的 Person 类可以处理这种多样性关系。
清单 2. 定义为多样性关系的家庭生活
package com.tedneward.model;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Iterator;
public class Person
{
public Person()
{ }
public Person(String firstName, String lastName, Gender gender, int age, Mood mood)
{
this.firstName = firstName;
this.lastName = lastName;
this.gender = gender;
this.age = age;
this.mood = mood;
}
public String getFirstName() { return firstName; }
public void setFirstName(String value) { firstName = value; }
public String getLastName() { return lastName; }
public void setLastName(String value) { lastName = value; }
public Gender getGender() { return gender; }
public int getAge() { return age; }
public void setAge(int value) { age = value; }
public Mood getMood() { return mood; }
public void setMood(Mood value) { mood = value; }
public Person getSpouse() { return spouse; }
public void setSpouse(Person value) {
// A few business rules
if (spouse != null)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Already married!");
if (value.getSpouse() != null && value.getSpouse() != this)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Already married!");
spouse = value;
// Highly sexist business rule
if (gender == Gender.FEMALE)
this.setLastName(value.getLastName());
// Make marriage reflexive, if its not already set that way
if (value.getSpouse() != this)
value.setSpouse(this);
}
public Address getHomeAddress() { return addresses[0]; }
public void setHomeAddress(Address value) { addresses[0] = value; }
public Address getWorkAddress() { return addresses[1]; }
public void setWorkAddress(Address value) { addresses[1] = value; }
public Address getVacationAddress() { return addresses[2]; }
public void setVacationAddress(Address value) { addresses[2] = value; }
public Iterator＜Person＞ getChildren() { return children.iterator(); }
public Person haveBaby(String name, Gender gender) {
// Business rule
if (this.gender.equals(Gender.MALE))
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Biological impossibility!");
// Another highly objectionable business rule
if (getSpouse() == null)
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Ethical impossibility!");
// Welcome to the world, little one!
Person child = new Person(name, this.lastName, gender, 0, Mood.CRANKY);
// Well, wouldnt YOU be cranky if youd just been pushed out of
// a nice warm place?!?
// These are your parents...
child.father = this.getSpouse();
child.mother = this;
// ... and youre their new baby.
// (Everybody say "Awwww....")
children.add(child);
this.getSpouse().children.add(child);
return child;
}
public String toString()
{
return
"[Person: " +
"firstName = " + firstName + " " +
"lastName = " + lastName + " " +
"gender = " + gender + " " +
"age = " + age + " " +
"mood = " + mood + " " +
(spouse != null ? "spouse = " + spouse.getFirstName() + " " : "") +
"]";
}
public boolean equals(Object rhs)
{
if (rhs == this)
return true;
if (!(rhs instanceof Person))
return false;
Person other = (Person)rhs;
return (this.firstName.equals(other.firstName) &&
this.lastName.equals(other.lastName) &&
this.gender.equals(other.gender) &&
this.age == other.age);
}
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
private Gender gender;
private int age;
private Mood mood;
private Person spouse;
private Address[] addresses = new Address[3];
private List＜Person＞ children = new ArrayList＜Person＞();
private Person mother;
private Person father;
}
即使包括所有这些代码，清单 2 提供的家庭关系模型还是过于简单。在这个层次结构中的某些地方，必须处理那些 null 值。但是，在 db4o 中，那个问题更应该在对象建模中解决，而不是在对象操作中解决。所以现在我可以放心地忽略它。
填充和测试对象模型
对于清单 2 中的 Person 类，需要重点注意的是，如果以关系的方式，使用父与子之间分层的、循环的引用来建模，那肯定会比较笨拙。通过一个实例化的对象模型可以更清楚地看到我所谈到的复杂性，所以我将编写一个探察测试来实例化 Person 类。注意，清单 3 中省略了 JUnit 支架（scaffolding）。
1
2
下一页>>
|
